Exosomes are small extracellular vesicles with a size range of 40–150 nm and a lipid bilayer membrane (1-4). They contain protein and nucleic acids, and mediate local and systemic intercellular communication (1-3). Many cell types can produce exosomes, the contents of which likely reflect the phenotypic states of the cells that generate them under both physiological and pathological conditions. They may convey these exosomal cargoes to neighboring or distant cells, and subsequently modulate the phenotype of these target cells. At first exosomes were thought to function as “cellular garbage bags”, but now these nano-sized extracellular vesicles are being studied for their role in progression and metastasis (5). Cancer-derived exosomes are reported to play a role in various malignant phenotype mechanisms such as proliferation, motility, invasive properties of the recipient cells, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), transferring drug resistance, immune evasion, and pre-metastatic niche formation (6-17). However, we still need to understand how exosomes and their cargoes function in recipient cells, and whether exosome packaging and release in the extracellular space is an active or passive process.
Lobb and colleagues, in a current issue of the International Journal of Cancer, have used a human preclinical model system to study some of these issues (18). While the exosome isolation, characterization, transfer, and monitoring methods for gene expression, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), and phenotyping for resistance to chemotherapy they used were all standard, the model system studied was novel. They studied an isogenic pair of immortalized (with CDK4 and human telomerase) human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) one of which was the “parental” strain (HBEC30KT) and one that had been manipulated with oncogenic changes (introduction of oncogenic KRAS, knockdown of p53 and LKB1/STK11, HBEC30KTp53/KRAS/LKB1) to progress it to malignancy and induction of EMT (18). Exosomes isolated from the non-malignant parent HBEC and from the oncogenically manipulated HBEC were then transferred to the non-malignant HBEC parent and the phenotypic changes including EMT, expression of EMT transcription factors, cancer stem cell markers and drug response phenotypes compared (18). Recent studies have shown that ZEB1 transcription factor-driven EMT promotes the loss of epithelial cell polarity and adhesion, induces cytoskeleton remodeling, and drives growth, migration, invasion, and metastasis (19-25). In the Lobb study, the oncogenic manipulated HBECs (HBEC30KTp53/KRAS/LKB1) but not parental HBEC30KT exhibit EMT, and cancer stem cell-like and drug resistance phenotypes (18). Both HBEC30KTp53/KRAS/LKB1 exosomes and parental HBEC30KT cells treated with HBEC30KTp53/KRAS/LKB1-derived exosomes were enriched in ZEB1 mRNA, suggesting that the horizontal transfer of a key EMT transcription factor, ZEB1, as exosome cargo from donor cells to target cell occurred after 24-hour co-culture. They demonstrated that HBEC30KTp53/KRAS/LKB1 exosomes conferred EMT phenotypic changes, expression of EMT transcription factors, cancer cell stem like phenotype and chemoresistance on the parental HBEC30KT cells in vitro. These results raise the possibility that lung epithelial cells that have suffered oncogenic changes resulting in important malignant phenotypes can communicate these changes via the transfer of mRNAs such as ZEB1 in exosomes to other epithelial cells.
The Lobb findings raise a number of important questions (4,13-17). In addition to the model system studied by Lobb, do real human cancer cells have this capacity? Does this process occur in vivo as well as in vitro? What oncogenic changes can induce (or are associated with) exosomal transferred phenotypic changes? Do such exosomal induced and transferred changes only occur in the setting of EMT? Which exosomal cargoes are important in transferring malignant phenotype information including mRNA, protein, miRNAs, noncoding long RNAs, DNA or other signaling molecules? Do exosomes of the cancer stem cell subpopulation play a larger role in transferring important malignant information than exosomes from other cell subtypes in the same tumor? Does the type of recipient cell determine the response to cancer derived exosomes? What happens to the recipient cells? For example, how long lived are the changes; do they facilitate further malignant progression of the recipient including assumption of a cancer stem cell phenotype; and what are the spatial dimensions of the transfer? Are they only local or can they be distant? Which tissues can function as recipients? What types of therapeutic resistance can be transferred? Do these include resistance to targeted therapy as well as chemotherapy, and can resistance to immunotherapy be transferred? In addition, what is the magnitude of the resistance transferred? Can this exosome mediated EMT ZEB1 transfer occur in other cancer lineages besides lung cancer? Tumors and their micro-environment are a composite of cancer cells (that can exhibit genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity), immune cells, mesenchymal stem cells, fibroblasts, neurons, endothelial cells, and epithelial cells and which of these participate (“donate” or “uptake” exosomes) in this process needs to be clarified.
Overall the study by Lobb provides important new information on the potential role of exosomes in transferring aspects of the malignant phenotype, particularly those associated with EMT and the role of ZEB1. For the long term, we will need to determine in patients, how important to the behavior of each patient’s tumor is the presence of such exosomal transfer, what is the best way to diagnose its presence and can this exosomal transfer be a target for cancer prevention and/or therapy?
Funding: The study was supported by NCI SPORE in Lung Cancer (P50CA70907).
Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned and reviewed by the Section Editor Long Chen (Department of PET-CT center at the Yunnan Tumor Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China).
Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2017.07.09). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
- Kahlert C, Kalluri R. Exosomes in tumor microenvironment influence cancer progression and metastasis. J Mol Med (Berl) 2013;91:431-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Raposo G, Stoorvogel W. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol 2013;200:373-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Théry C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Immunol 2002;2:569-79. [PubMed]
- Vlassov AV, Magdaleno S, Setterquist R, et al. Exosomes: current knowledge of their composition, biological functions, and diagnostic and therapeutic potentials. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012;1820:940-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hoshino A, Costa-Silva B, Shen TL, et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature 2015;527:329-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Al-Nedawi K, Meehan B, Kerbel RS, et al. Endothelial expression of autocrine VEGF upon the uptake of tumor-derived microvesicles containing oncogenic EGFR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:3794-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Paggetti J, Haderk F, Seiffert M, et al. Exosomes released by chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells induce the transition of stromal cells into cancer-associated fibroblasts. Blood 2015;126:1106-17. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Peinado H, Aleckovic M, Lavotshkin S, et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat Med 2012;18:883-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Théry C, Ostrowski M, Segura E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2009;9:581-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wen SW, Sceneay J, Lima LG, et al. The Biodistribution and Immune Suppressive Effects of Breast Cancer-Derived Exosomes. Cancer Res 2016;76:6816-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tickner JA, Urquhart AJ, Stephenson SA, et al. Functions and therapeutic roles of exosomes in cancer. Front Oncol 2014;4:127. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Costa-Silva B, Aiello NM, Ocean AJ, et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat Cell Biol 2015;17:816-26. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bach DH, Hong JY, Park HJ, et al. The role of exosomes and miRNAs in drug-resistance of cancer cells. Int J Cancer 2017;141:220-30. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Guo W, Gao Y, Li N, et al. Exosomes: New players in cancer Oncol Rep 2017;38:665-75. (Review). [PubMed]
- Vanni I, Alama A, Grossi F, et al. Exosomes: a new horizon in lung cancer. Drug Discov Today 2017;22:927-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Whiteside TL. Exosomes carrying immunoinhibitory proteins and their role in cancer. Clin Exp Immunol 2017; [Epub ahead of print]. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wu J, Qu Z, Fei ZW, et al. Role of stem cell-derived exosomes in cancer. Oncol Lett 2017;13:2855-66. [PubMed]
- Lobb RJ, van Amerongen R, Wiegmans A, et al. Exosomes derived from mesenchymal non-small cell lung cancer cells promote chemoresistance. Int J Cancer 2017;141:614-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Larsen JE, Nathan V, Osborne JK, et al. ZEB1 drives epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in lung cancer. J Clin Invest 2016;126:3219-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Ahn YH, Gibbons DL, Chakravarti D, et al. ZEB1 drives prometastatic actin cytoskeletal remodeling by downregulating miR-34a expression. J Clin Invest 2012;122:3170-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bae GY, Choi SJ, Lee JS, et al. Loss of E-cadherin activates EGFR-MEK/ERK signaling, which promotes invasion via the ZEB1/MMP2 axis in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2013;4:2512-22. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kundu ST, Byers LA, Peng DH, et al. The miR-200 family and the miR-183~96~182 cluster target Foxf2 to inhibit invasion and metastasis in lung cancers. Oncogene 2016;35:173-86. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Liu W, Huang YJ, Liu C, et al. Inhibition of TBK1 attenuates radiation-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of A549 human lung cancer cells via activation of GSK-3beta and repression of ZEB1. Lab Invest 2014;94:362-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Moon YW, Rao G, Kim JJ, et al. LAMC2 enhances the metastatic potential of lung adenocarcinoma. Cell Death Differ 2015;22:1341-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zhang T, Guo L, Creighton CJ, et al. A genetic cell context-dependent role for ZEB1 in lung cancer. Nat Commun 2016;7:12231. [Crossref] [PubMed]