Would the skyrocketed advances of immune checkpoint inhibitors over chemotherapy be stumbled by the safety issues?
Editorial

Would the skyrocketed advances of immune checkpoint inhibitors over chemotherapy be stumbled by the safety issues?

Kyrillus S. Shohdy1, Omar Abdel-Rahman2

1Clinical Oncology Department, Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; 2Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence to: Omar Abdel-Rahman. Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. Email: omar.abdelrhman@med.asu.edu.eg.

Comment on: Nishijima TF, Shachar SS, Nyrop KA, et al. Safety and Tolerability of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Compared with Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Oncologist 2017;22:470-9.



Submitted Jun 26, 2017. Accepted for publication Jun 30, 2017.

doi: 10.21037/tcr.2017.07.03


Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have inaugurated a new era in the treatment of advanced malignancies. It is not only associated with higher progression-free survival and overall-survival but also a durable response that reached to 10 years in certain subsets of patients (1). This superiority over conventional chemotherapy regimens guaranteed an approval for ICIs in second and even first lines in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Of those molecularly defined immune targeting, PD-1 and PD-L1 pathways are influential in suppressing effector immune response against tumor. That’s why anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) could induce sustainable anti-tumor immune response. Unfortunately, this immune system manipulation may lead to emergence of autoimmune manifestations, usually reported as immune-related adverse effects.

The promising results of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs in many advanced tumors introduced a new paradigm in cancer drug approval based on certain biomarkers irrespective of tissue/organ of origin. Pembrolizumab was the first to get “tumor-agnostic” approval from US FDA (2). This means that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 will be available option to use in many tumor types that were conventionally managed with certain lines of chemotherapy. Awareness to the different safety profile between these chemotherapy regimens and ICIs is of utmost importance as direct head-to-head comparison of safety data may not be available from clinical trials.

Nishijima et al. published a meta-analysis in the Oncologist addressing the issue of safety of PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors compared to chemotherapy (3). The analysis included 7 randomized trials all but one was open label recruiting 2,090 patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 mAb versus 1,360 receiving chemotherapy. The authors categorized the analyzed adverse effects into three main groups with distinct clinical relevance.

First category included conventional treatment-related symptoms entailing the eight commonly reported symptoms across the seven trials. Fatigue, anorexia, nausea, constipation, diarrhea and sensory neuropathy were associated with significant lower relative risk in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 group. Moreover, only high-grade fatigue, diarrhea and sensory neuropathy were associated with significant lower relative risk with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Other all grade and high-grade symptoms showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. These results are apparently in contrary to previous meta-analysis that showed an increase risk of GI toxicities with ICIs (4). This can be explained in part that this meta-analysis included an anti-CTLA-4 and the comparison arm was heterogenous including both chemotherapy and placebo controls. Moreover, the subgroup analysis showed an increase in the risk of diarrhea with ipilimumab-based regimen and this did not hold true for nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 mAb. Diarrhea in particular warrants further analysis based on individual patients’ data as it might underlie autoimmune GI affection but it is still reassuring that incidence of all and high grade-diarrhea were low among PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors group.

Second category included all grade and high grade hematologic toxicities. A significantly lower relative risk was found in patients of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor group for hematological toxicity compared to control regimens. It is worth noting that the most commonly compared chemotherapy regimen was docetaxel (in four trials of NSCLC).

Third category is the immune-related AEs; and -as expected- they showed a higher risk with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors including dermatologic, endocrinopathies, and pneumonitis. Interestingly high-grade AEs in such category showed non-significant difference between the two groups except for incidence of high-grade pneumonitis with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared with chemotherapy (1.3% versus 0.6%; RR 3.21, P=0.01). This is supported with results of our meta-analysis of eleven trials that found an increased risk of pneumonitis with ICIs in comparison to chemotherapy or placebo (5). Again, this meta-analysis included anti-CTLA-4.

An interesting point discussed by authors is the patients, reported outcomes (that was included in design of two of the analyzed trials and many other ongoing trials). Patients who received PD-1 inhibitors reported better global health status quality-of-life score. Another intriguing point is that the age and performance status, the major two determinants in chemotherapy choice and clinical decision making, did not demonstrate any clear difference in efficacy and toxicity outcomes rendering the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors potential choice for older and frail patients.

We are concerned about generalizing the results of this meta-analysis as the comparison arm in most occasions was single agent docetaxel. Although the authors performed subgroup analysis based on type of chemotherapy regimen (docetaxel versus others), we cannot come to an unequivocal conclusion that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are more tolerable and safe than conventional chemotherapeutic regimens. Further focused analysis of certain toxicity endpoints is still required, pneumonitis is a striking example in such regard (6). For instance, a recent meta-analysis revealed that the risk of pneumonitis was lower in patients who received prior chemotherapy in comparison with treatment-naïve group (7) reflecting that the relationship between ICIs and chemotherapy is intermingled at many points and the patients with advanced cancer should be counselled on the risks and benefits of both approaches.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned and reviewed by the Section Editor Wei Xu (Division of Respiratory Disease, Department of Geriatrics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China).

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2017.07.03). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, et al. Pooled Analysis of Long-Term Survival Data From Phase II and Phase III Trials of Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:1889-94. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. US FDA. FDA grants accelerated approval to pembrolizumab for first tissue/site agnostic indication. Cited 2017 Jun 22. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ApprovedDrugs/ucm560040.htm
  3. Nishijima TF, Shachar SS, Nyrop KA, et al. Safety and Tolerability of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Compared with Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Oncologist 2017;22:470-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Abdel-Rahman O, ElHalawani H, Fouad M. Risk of gastrointestinal complications in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Immunotherapy 2015;7:1213-27. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Abdel-Rahman O, Fouad M. Risk of pneumonitis in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2016;10:183-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Nishino M, Giobbie-Hurder A, Hatabu H, et al. Incidence of Programmed Cell Death 1 Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2016;2:1607-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Khunger M, Rakshit S, Pasupuleti V, et al. Incidence of pneumonitis with use of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of trials. Chest 2017; [Epub ahead of print].
Cite this article as: Shohdy KS, Abdel-Rahman O. Would the skyrocketed advances of immune checkpoint inhibitors over chemotherapy be stumbled by the safety issues? Transl Cancer Res 2017;6(Suppl 6):S1025-S1026. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2017.07.03

Download Citation