Clinical preliminary study on the correlation between nodular goitre and papillary thyroid carcinoma
Introduction
Thyroid cancer (TC) is one of the most common solid endocrine malignant tumours. It is more common in women, and its incidence has been increasing yearly. Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common TC. Therefore, this study was performed to focus on PTC. According to research conducted in China, the incidence of TC increased by 1.93-fold in Tianjin from 1981 to 2006, while the incidence of PTC increased by 5.7-fold (1). The growth rate of PTC was ranked second among all female malignant tumours (1). In 2006, the incidence of TC was ranked eighth among female malignant tumours (1). By 2012, it was ranked third in incidence among all female malignancies (2). According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, the number of new-onset TC cases in the United States in 2017 was estimated as 56,870, ranking fifth among female malignancies (3). The increasing incidence of PTC is associated with the popularity of high-resolution ultrasound and the application of fine-needle biopsy, which have led to the early detection of micro papillary thyroid carcinoma (MPTC) (4). However, more importantly, the increase may be closely related to changes in people’s living environment and eating habits (5). Accordingly, an in-depth study of PTC risk factors and clinical features is of great significance for the prevention and early detection of clinical PTC.
To date, mainstream studies have shown that nodular goitre (NG), a high body mass index (BMI), and Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) are risk factors for TC and are closely related to the occurrence and development of TC (6-8). Among them, multinodular goiter is considered to be a strong risk factor for TC (9). Clinically, NG is a surgical indication if cancerization nodules are suspected (10). Although these studies have confirmed that individual factors such as BMI and HT are risk factors for PTC, whether these factors can increase the risk of NG development to PTC still remains unknown. There is no systematic study on the similarities or differences in the tumour biological characteristics between patients with NG&PTC and those with PTC.
Accordingly, this study retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 650 patients undergoing surgery for thyroid nodule from January 2015 to January 2016 in the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with NG, PTC or NG&PTC, investigate the potential risk factors for NG cancerization to PTC, and study the similarities and differences in tumour biology between NG&PTC and PTC to provide a new research direction and theoretical basis for the clinical prevention and treatment of TC. We present the following article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-19-2951).
Methods
Research subjects
Ethics Statement
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (No.2015-S135), and each participant signed an informed consent. The whole research was conducted in accordance with the approved guidelines.
Patient inclusion and exclusion criteria
The following were the inclusion criteria: all patients undergoing thyroid nodule surgery at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 1, 2015, to January 31, 2016, and all patients with available data, such as height, weight, free triiodothyronine (FT3) level within 1 week before surgery, free thyroxine (FT4) level, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level and postoperative pathology.
The exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with a history of oral antithyroid drugs or thyroid hormone within 3 months before surgery; patients with a history of radioactive iodine treatment; patients pathologically diagnosed with non-PTC or non-NG; patients with a previous history of head and neck irradiation or thyroid disease surgery; patients with a history of other cancers; patients with a family history of TC; and patients aged <18 or >80 years.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital.
Patient data
General data
The general data include age, gender, height, weight and residence location. The formula for BMI is: BMI = weight (kg)/height2 (m2), and the BMI was classified based on Chinese standards (BMI <18.5, 18.5–23.9, ≥24, corresponding to underweight, normal weight and overweight, respectively; in the overweight category, BMI 24–27.9 is considered as overweight, and BMI ≥28 is considered as obese) (11). The body surface area (BSA) was calculated using the DU.bois formula, namely, BSA =0.007184 × [weight (kg)]0.425 × [height (cm)]0.725 (12).
Laboratory studies
Serum FT3, FT4 and TSH concentrations were measured within one week before surgery. The test results of 420 patients were obtained from the Nuclear Medicine Laboratory of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University by using the ADVIA Centaur® XP immunoassay analyser from Siemens Inc. The normal ranges are as follows: FT3: 1.8–4.2 pg/mL; FT4: 0.8–1.76 ng/mL; and TSH: 0.35–5.5 µIU/mL. The data of the remaining 153 patients were obtained from the Endocrine Laboratory of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University by using Roche’s Cobas e601 electrochemiluminescence detection immunoassay system. The normal ranges are as follows: FT3: 3.1–6.8 pmol/L; FT4: 10.3–22.65 pmol/L; and TSH: 0.27–4.2 µIU/mL.
Pathological data
The pathological data included the pathological type of nodules, the number of cancer nodules, the size of cancer nodules, the degrees of lymph node metastasis and degree of inflammation. The pathology reports were obtained from the Department of Pathology of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University.
Statistical analysis
IBM SPSS 22.0 statistical software was used for the statistical analysis. Quantitative data with a normal distribution are expressed as . A t-test was used to compare the difference in the mean between the two groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences in the mean between the multiple groups. The categorical variables are expressed as the number of patients and percentages, and the chi-square test was used to compare the difference between the rates or composition ratio of the groups. The risk factors for PTC in NG patients were analysed by logistic regression analysis, with αin=0.05 and αout=0.10. The relative risk was assessed by the odds ratio (OR), and the 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Characteristics of patients with NG, NG&PTC and PTC
In terms of age composition, there were significant differences between the NG patients (47.19±12.03), NG&PTC patients (40.38±10.40) and PTC patients (45.54±12.06) (F=20.359, P<0.001), as shown in Table 1. Considering that age is important for PTC staging and prognosis, the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) uses age (over 55) as a reference to determine the mortality risk in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) (13). We converted the data to nominal variables based on the age of 55 years for the stratified analysis, which showed that there were significant differences between NG patients (82 patients aged over 55 years, 25.9%), NG&PTC patients (15 patients aged over 55 years, 20.3%) and PTC patients (11 patients aged over 55 years, 6.0%) (χ2=30.065, P<0.001), as shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Variable | NG (n=317) | PTC (n=183) | NG&PTC (n=74) | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 47.19±12.03 | 40.38±10.40 | 45.54±12.06 | <0.001 |
<55, n (%) | 235 (74.1) | 172 (94.0) | 59 (79.7) | |
≥55, n (%) | 82 (25.9) | 11 (6.0) | 15 (20.3) | <0.001 |
Sex, n (%) | ||||
Male | 70 (22.1) | 64 (35.0) | 16 (21.6) | |
Female | 247 (77.9) | 119 (65.0) | 58 (78.4) | 0.004 |
Residence location, n (%) | ||||
Rural | 201 (63.4) | 97 (53.0) | 36 (48.6) | |
Urban | 116 (36.6) | 86 (47.0) | 38 (51.4) | 0.015 |
In terms of gender composition, there were significant differences between NG patients (247 female patients, 77.9%), NG&PTC patients (58 female patients, 78.4%) and PTC patients (119 female patients, 65.0%) (χ2=10.883, P=0.004), as shown in Table 1.
In terms of residence composition, there were significant differences between NG patients (116 patients in urban areas, 36.6%), NG&PTC patients (38 female patients, 51.4%) and PTC patients (86 female patients, 47.0%) (χ2=8.337, P=0.015), as shown in Table 1.
Comparison of risk factors between the NG and NG&PTC patients
Although the composition characteristics of the three types of patients (NG, NG&PTC or PTC) were significantly different, we still suspected that a relationship may exist between the three types of patients. First, we conducted an analysis comparing patients with NG and those with NG&PTC. In terms of age, there was no significant difference (F=0.049, P=0.290) between the NG patients (47.19±12.03) and NG&PTC patients (45.54±12.06). We converted the data to a nominal variable based on the age of 55 years for the stratified analysis, which showed no significant differences between the NG patients (82patients aged over 55 years, 25.9%) and NG&PTC patients (15 patients aged over 55 years, 20.3%) (χ2=1.008, P=0.315; Table 2).
Table 2
Risk factors | NG (n=317) | NG&PTC (n=74) | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 47.19±12.03 | 45.54±12.06 | 0.290 |
<55 | 235 (74.1%) | 59 (79.7%) | |
≥55 | 82 (25.9%) | 15 (20.3%) | 0.315 |
Sex | |||
Male | 70 (22.1%) | 16 (21.6%) | |
Female | 247 (77.9%) | 58 (78.4%) | 0.931 |
Residence location | |||
Rural | 201 (63.4%) | 36 (48.6%) | |
Urban | 116 (36.6%) | 38 (51.4%) | 0.019 |
BMI | 23.17±3.23 | 23.89±3.53 | 0.094 |
<24 | 204 (64.4%) | 35 (47.3%) | |
≥24 | 113 (35.6%) | 39 (52.7%) | 0.007 |
BMIF | |||
<24 | 172 (69.6%) | 32 (55.2%) | |
≥24 | 75 (30.4%) | 26 (44.8%) | 0.035 |
BMIM | |||
<24 | 32 (45.7%) | 3 (18.8%) | |
≥24 | 38 (54.3%) | 13 (81.3%) | 0.048 |
BSA | 1.61±0.16 | 1.63±0.14 | 0.353 |
BSAF | 1.57±0.11 | 1.59±0.10 | 0.159 |
BSAM | 1.80±0.16 | 1.80±0.13 | 0.862 |
Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) | |||
Y | 5 (1.6%) | 4 (5.4%) | |
N | 312 (98.4%) | 70 (94.6%) | 0.122 |
In terms of gender composition, there were no significant differences between NG patients (247 female patients, 77.9%) and NG&PTC patients (58 female patients, 78.4%) (χ2=0.007, P=0.931), as shown in Table 2.
Regarding residence composition, there were significant differences between the NG patients (116 patients in urban areas, 36.6%) and NG&PTC patients (38 female patients, 51.4%) (χ2=5.474, P=0.019; Table 2).
In terms of BMI, there was no significant difference between NG patients (23.17±3.23) and NG&PTC patients (23.89±3.53) (F=2.458, P=0.094). Considering the difference between the Chinese population and the world population(11), according to Chinese standards, we converted “overweight” into a nominal variable based on BMI≥24 for further analysis, which showed that NG patients (113 overweight patients, 35.6%) and NG&PTC patients (39 overweight patients, 52.7%) had significantly different BMIs (χ2=7.345, P=0.007). Given the sexual dimorphism of obesity (14,15), patients were compared separately according to gender. Among the female patients, BMI was significantly different (χ2=4.436, P=0.035) between the NG patients (75 overweight patients, 30.4%) and NG&PTC patients (26 overweight patients, 44.8%). Among the male patients, BMI was still significantly different (χ2=3.923, P=0.048) between the NG patients (38 overweight, 54.3%) and NG&PTC patients (13 overweight patients, 81.3%), as shown in Table 2.
In terms of BSA, there was no significant difference between the NG (1.61±0.16) and NG&PTC (1.63±0.14) patients (F=1.354, P=0.353). Given the sexual dimorphism of obesity (14,15), patients were compared separately according to gender. Among the female patients, BSA was not significantly different between the NG (1.57±0.11) and NG&PTC (1.59±0.10) patients (F=0.226, P=0.159). Among the male patients, there was no significant difference between the NG patients (1.80±0.16) and NG&PTC (1.80±0.13) patients (F=0.747, P=0.862), as shown in Table 2.
In terms of HT, there was no significant difference (χ2=2.393, P=0.122) between the NG patients (5 patients with HT, 1.6%) and NG&PTC patients (4 patients with HT, 5.4%; Table 2).
Therefore, we speculated that the NG&PTC patients may be a subset of the NG patients.
Differences in thyroid function between the NG and NG&PTC patients
To test this speculation, we further studied the thyroid function of both NG and NG&PTC patients. Two types of serum thyroid-related hormone testing equipment were available in our hospital and were used randomly for the patients included in this study. This resulted in a reduced sample size for each piece of equipment. Thus, we compared the results separately according to the equipment used.
The samples of 420 patients were assessed using a Siemens ADVIA Centaur® XP immunoassay device, including samples from 224 NG patients and 58 NG&PTC patients. The FT3 level was not significantly different between the NG patients (3.18±0.48) and NG&PTC patients (3.16±0.57) (F=0.355, P=0.758). The FT4 level was not significantly different between the NG patients (1.27±0.67) and the NG&PTC patients (1.48±1.81) (F=4.459, P=0.400). The TSH level was not significantly different between the NG patients (1.75±2.69) and NG&PTC patients (2.08±2.44) (F=0.497, P=0.397), as shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Risk factor | NG (n=224) | NG&PTC (n=58) | P value |
---|---|---|---|
FT3 | 3.18±0.48 | 3.16±0.57 | 0.758 |
FT4 | 1.27±0.67 | 1.48±1.81 | 0.400 |
TSH | 1.75±2.69 | 2.08±2.44 | 0.397 |
The samples from 154 patients were measured using a Roche Cobas e601 electrochemiluminescence detection immunoassay system, including samples from 93 NG patients and 16 NG&PTC patients. The FT3 level was not significantly different between the NG patients (5.12±1.01) and NG&PTC patients (4.97±0.84) (F=0.838, P=0.565). The FT4 level was not significantly different between the NG patients (16.24±3.00) and NG&PTC patients (15.31±5.18) (F=4.551, P=0.494). The TSH level was not significantly different between the NG patients (1.89±1.51) and NG&PTC patients (2.61±1.73) (F=0.759, P=0.090), as shown in Table 4.
Table 4
Risk factor | NG (n=93) | NG&PTC (n=16) | P value |
---|---|---|---|
FT3 | 5.12±1.01 | 4.97±0.84 | 0.565 |
FT4 | 16.24±3.00 | 15.31±5.18 | 0.494 |
TSH | 1.89±1.51 | 2.61±1.73 | 0.090 |
These data further confirm the speculation that the NG&PTC patients may be a subset of the NG patients.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for patients with NG or NG&PTC
Since the NG&PTC patients may be a subset of the NG patients, what risk factors can trigger this progression? Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that residence in an urban area (P=0.020) and BMI ≥24 (P=0.007) were risk factors for PTC occurrence in patients with NG. Female sex (P=0.931), age ≥55 years (P=0.371), large BSA (P=0.352), and concurrent HT (P=0.062) were not risk factors for PTC occurrence in patients with NG, as shown in Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that residence in an urban area (P=0.008) and BMI ≥24 (P=0.012) were independent risk factors for PTC occurrence in patients with NG, as shown in Table 6.
Table 5
Selected variable | b | Sb | P | OR | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female | −0.027 | 0.313 | 0.931 | 0.973 | 0.527–1.798 |
Age ≥55 years | 0.317 | 0.316 | 0.371 | 1.372 | 0.738–2.551 |
Residence in an urban area | −0.604 | 0.260 | 0.020 | 0.547 | 0.328–0.910 |
BSA | 0.762 | 0.819 | 0.352 | 2.142 | 0.430–10.654 |
Presence of HT | −1.271 | 0.684 | 0.062 | 0.280 | 0.073–1.071 |
BMI ≥24 | −0.699 | 0.261 | 0.007 | 0.497 | 0.298–0.829 |
Table 6
Selected variable | b | Sb | P | OR | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female | −0.112 | 0.427 | 0.794 | 0.894 | 0.387–2.066 |
Age ≥55 years | 0.385 | 0.329 | 0.243 | 1.469 | 0.770–2.802 |
Residence in an urban area | −0.719 | 0.271 | 0.008 | 0.487 | 0.287–0.829 |
BSA | −0.767 | 1.386 | 0.580 | 0.464 | 0.031–7.020 |
Presence of Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) | −1.353 | 0.715 | 0.058 | 0.258 | 0.064–1.049 |
BMI ≥24 | −0.865 | 0.346 | 0.012 | 0.421 | 0.214–0.829 |
Therefore, the NG patients may become NG&PTC patients due to NG cancerization facilitated by a high BMI.
Effects of NG on the tumour biological characteristics of PTC
What is the difference in the biological characteristics of tumours between the NG&PTC and PTC patients? We further compared and analysed the tumour biological characteristics between the NG&PTC and PTC patients.
Regarding number of cancer nodules, NG&PTC patients (64 patients with single cancer nodules, 86.5%) and PTC patients (128 patients with single cancer nodules, 69.9%) had significantly different numbers (χ2=7.630, P=0.006), as shown in Table 7.
Table 7
Factors | PTC | NG&PTC | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Number of cancer nodules | |||
Single | 128 (69.9%) | 64 (86.5%) | |
Multiple | 55 (30.1%) | 10 (13.5%) | 0.006 |
Cancer nodule size | |||
≤1 cm | 111 (60.7%) | 49 (66.2%) | |
>1 cm | 72 (39.3%) | 25 (33.8%) | 0.405 |
Extra-glandular invasion | |||
N | 166 (90.7%) | 67 (90.5%) | |
Y | 17 (9.3%) | 7 (9.5%) | 0.966 |
Lymph node metastasis | |||
N | 123 (67.2%) | 63 (85.1%) | |
Y | 60 (32.8%) | 11 (14.9%) | 0.004 |
Central lymph node metastasis | |||
N | 131 (71.6%) | 65 (87.8%) | |
Y | 52 (28.4%) | 9 (12.2%) | 0.006 |
Lateral lymph node metastasis | |||
N | 166 (90.7%) | 71 (95.9%) | |
Y | 17 (9.3%) | 3 (4.1%) | 0.156 |
Regarding the size of cancer nodules, that in NG&PTC patients (25 patients with cancer nodules >1 cm, 33.8%) and PTC patients (72 patients with cancer nodules >1 cm, 39.3%) was not significantly different (χ2=0.693, P=0.405), as shown in Table 7.
Regarding extra-glandular invasion, the results in NG&PTC patients (7 positive patients, 9.5%) and PTC patients (17 positive patients, 9.3%) were not significantly different (χ2=0.002, P=0.966), as shown in Table 7.
In terms of lymph node metastasis, the results in the NG&PTC patients (11 patients with metastases, 14.9%) and PTC patients (60 patients with metastases, 32.8%) were significantly different (χ2=8.465, P=0.004). Furthermore, central lymph node metastasis was significantly different (χ2=7.690, P=0.006) between the NG&PTC patients (9 patients with metastasis, 12.3%) and PTC patients (52 patients with metastasis, 28.4%). Lateral cervical lymph node metastasis was not significantly different between the NG&PTC patients (3 patients with metastases, 4.1%) and PTC patients (17 patients with metastases, 9.3%) (χ2=2.013, P=0.156), as shown in Table 7.
Thus, NG may influence intra- and extra-glandular metastasis of PTC but has no effect on its growth and invasion.
Discussion
Current studies indicate that the occurrence and development of PTC may be related to multiple factors (16,17). The presence of NG is one of the high-risk factors. In addition, the possible risk factors for TC include gender, geographic location, radiation, inflammation, obesity, abnormal iodine intake, TSH, thyroid hormone, Ras gene activation, BARV V600E gene mutation and P53 gene inactivation (18,19). These risk factors may also cause the progression of NG to TC. Therefore, we conducted the above retrospective analysis based on the clinical facts.
From the perspective of patient characteristics, the three groups differed in age, gender, and residence location. Previous studies have confirmed that the mean age of NG patients is greater than that of PTC patients, and the incidence of NG is greater among women (19). Our study further found that the difference in age and sex composition ratios between the NG&PTC group and the NG group was relatively smaller than that between the NG&PTC group and PTC group. In the residence location composition, the difference between the NG&PTC group and the PTC group was relatively smaller than that between the NG&PTC and NG groups. In summary, the NG&PTC patients and NG patients may be from the same general population, and the NG&PTC patients may have originally been NG patients who progressed to NG&PTC patients under the impact of certain factors. The distribution of residence location was similar between the NG&PTC patients and the PTC patients, but it should be noted that patients living in an urban area have convenient access to medical service (e.g., frequent physical examination), which is helpful for early detection of PTC.
In a further comparison between NG patients and NG&PTC patients, chi-square and univariate logistic regression analyses showed that residence in an urban area and BMI ≥24 were risk factors for PTC occurrence in patients with NG. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that residence in an urban area and BMI ≥24 are independent risk factors for PTC occurrence in patients with NG. The analysis of the differences in residence composition has been described above. Some studies have shown a relationship between obesity and cancer. Some researchers have suggested that adipose cells are one of the main components of the matrix surrounding the tumour and can secrete some signalling molecules and provide nutritional support for the cancer cells they surround. Adipose cells act as an endocrine organ and “granary” in the proliferation and metastasis of tumours (20-22). However, the mechanism by which high body fat percentage affects cancer remains unclear. In clinical practice, overweight patients with thyroid nodules may need to receive more frequent follow-up with active examinations. However, whether weight control can prevent the progression of NG to PTC remains to be further studied.
The NG&PTC patients had similar age and gender composition ratios to those of the NG patients. Other studies have shown that age and gender are not risk factors for PTC occurrence in NG patients. The study by Kim et al. (23). revealed that BSA is associated with multifocality of PTC. In the present study, BSA was not a risk factor for the development of PTC in patients with NG. Some researchers have found that the preoperative elevated serum TSH level is associated with an increased incidence of PTC (24,25). The data we obtained by two methods showed that there were no significant differences in serum FT3, FT4 and TSH levels between NG patients and NG&PTC patients. This result suggests that thyroid hormone or thyroid stimulating hormone may not cause the occurrence of PTC in NG patients.
Moreover, we also compared the difference in tumour status between the NG&PTC patients and the PTC patients and attempted to analyse the effect of NG on PTC progression. In the study, we found that more NG&PTC patients presented with single-focal carcinoma and were less prone to the occurrence of central lymph node metastasis. The growth of NG nodules may limit intra- and extra-glandular metastasis of PTC. Although there was no significant difference in lateral lymph node metastasis between the two groups, this may be due to the low rate of lateral lymph node metastasis and the insufficient sample size. In terms of tumour diameter and extra-glandular invasion, there were no significant differences between the NG&PTC patients and PTC patients. This result may indicate that NG may not affect the growth and invasion of PTC.
In conclusion, NG&PTC patients and NG patients may come from the same general population. Overweight may trigger the occurrence of PTC in NG patients. NG may limit intra- and extra-glandular metastasis of PTC but does not affect the growth and invasion of PTC. Based on the above conclusions, we may need to be more careful in the identification and follow-up of patients with thyroid nodules in clinical practice. Furthermore, because intra- and extra-glandular metastases are not common in NG&PTC patients, aggressive treatments, such as lymph node dissection or postoperative 131I radiation therapy, may not be suitable.
Acknowledgments
We thank Hao Deng and Fei Zhao for providing valuable technical supports and assistance.
Funding: This work was supported by
Footnote
Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STROBE reporting checklist. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-19-2951
Data Sharing Statement: Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-19-2951
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-19-2951). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The scheme was authorized by ethics committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (No: 2015-S135). Each participant signed an informed consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013).
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
References
- Qian B, He M, Gao M, et al. Thyroid cancer incidence in the city of Tianjing during 2002-2006 and its secular trend in recent 26 years. Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2011;26:275-8.
- Wang Z, Wu Y. Interpretation of diagnosis and treatment guidelines for differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Surgical Theory and Practice 2014;168:185-8.
- Haddad RI, Nasr C, Bischoff L, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Thyroid Carcinoma, Version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018;16:1429-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Davies L, Welch HG. Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the United States, 1973-2002. JAMA 2006;295:2164-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Enewold L, Zhu K, Ron E, et al. Rising thyroid cancer incidence in the United States by demographic and tumor characteristics, 1980-2005. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:784-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kim KW, Park YJ, Kim EH, Park SY, Park DJ, Ahn SH, et al. Elevated risk of papillary thyroid cancer in Korean patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Head Neck 2011;33:691-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Peterson E, De P, Nuttall R. BMI, diet and female reproductive factors as risks for thyroid cancer: a systematic review. PLoS One 2012;7:e29177. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Meinhold CL, Ron E, Schonfeld SJ, Alexander BH, Freedman DM, Linet MS, et al. Nonradiation risk factors for thyroid cancer in the US Radiologic Technologists Study. Am J Epidemiol 2010;171:242-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gandolfi PP, Frisina A, Raffa M, et al. The incidence of thyroid carcinoma in multinodular goiter: retrospective analysis. Acta Biomed 2004;75:114-7. [PubMed]
- Xiaoping C, Jianping W. Surgery. Eighth edition: People’s Health Publishing House; 2013.
- Li H, Yang L, Zhang N. Accuracy of body mass index as a screening standard for obesity. Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2014;15:571-5.
- Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition 1989;5:303-11; discussion 12-3. [PubMed]
- Tanase K, Thies ED, Mäder U, et al. The TNM system (version 7) is the most accurate staging system for the prediction of loss of life expectancy in differentiated thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2016;84:284-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- White UA, Tchoukalova YD. Sex dimorphism and depot differences in adipose tissue function. Biochim Biophys Acta 2014;1842:377-92.
- Palmer BF, Clegg DJ. The sexual dimorphism of obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2015;402:113-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bosetti C, Kolonel L, Negri E, et al. A pooled analysis of case-control studies of thyroid cancer. VI. Fish and shellfish consumption. Cancer Causes & Control 2001;12:375-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Myung SK, Lee CW, Lee J, et al. Risk Factors for Thyroid Cancer: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study in Korean Adults. Cancer Res Treat 2017;49:70-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Zhai JM, Yuan S. Advances in thyroid carcinoma risk factor. Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention & Treatment 2012;19:791-5.
- Rago T, Fiore E, Scutari M, et al. Male sex, single nodularity, and young age are associated with the risk of finding a papillary thyroid cancer on fine-needle aspiration cytology in a large series of patients with nodular thyroid disease. Eur J Endocrinol 2010;162:763-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Nieman KM, Kenny HA, Penicka CV, et al. Adipocytes promote ovarian cancer metastasis and provide energy for rapid tumor growth. Nat Med 2011;17:1498-503. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Tessitore L, Vizio B, Pesola D, et al. Adipocyte expression and circulating levels of leptin increase in both gynaecological and breast cancer patients. Int J Oncol 2004;24:1529-35. [PubMed]
- Park J, Scherer PE. Adipocyte-derived endotrophin promotes malignant tumor progression. J Clin Invest 2012;122:4243-56. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Kim SK, Woo JW, Park I, et al. Influence of Body Mass Index and Body Surface Area on the Behavior of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid 2016;26:657-66. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fiore E, Rago T, Latrofa F, et al. Hashimoto's thyroiditis is associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma: role of TSH and of treatment with L-thyroxine. Endocr Relat Cancer 2011;18:429-37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fiore E, Rago T, Provenzale MA, et al. L-thyroxine-treated patients with nodular goiter have lower serum TSH and lower frequency of papillary thyroid cancer: results of a cross-sectional study on 27 914 patients. Endocr Relat Cancer 2010;17:231-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]