Trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity: what do we know in 2020?

Trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), has transformed treatment outcomes for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (1). Trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity (TRC) remains the most common cause of treatment interruption. The spectrum of TRC ranges from mild, asymptomatic reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to fulminant congestive cardiac failure (CCF) and cardiac death. Mechanisms of TRC are now well understood to be distinct from that of anthracycline-induced TRC and largely due to reversible suppression of cardiomyocyte HER2 signaling (2). However, the identification of predictive biomarkers of TRC, and the benefit of pharmacological agents to prevent TRC has been controversial to date and an area of ongoing research interest.

A 2012 Cochrane meta-analysis (3) identified eight studies of trastuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer. This included the four landmark RCTs (NCCTG N9831, NSABP B-31, HERA trial, BCIRG-006) (4-6). The meta-analysis found that the addition of adjuvant trastuzumab to chemotherapy improved disease-free survival (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.57–0.77, P<0.00001) and overall survival (HR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5–0.71, P<0.00001) (3). The benefits of trastuzumab were observed irrespective of tumor stage, hormone receptor status or age. Consequently, 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab has now been accepted as the standard of care.

However, the rates of reported cardiac toxicity associated with trastuzumab differed across individual trials. For example, reported rates of asymptomatic LVEF decline ranged from 7% in the HERA trial (5) to 18.9% in the BCIRG-006 trial (6). Furthermore, rates of Grade III/IV CCF/cardiac death events ranged from 0% in the FinHer Study [utilizing 9 weeks of adjuvant trastuzumab given with docetaxel alone (7)] to 4.1% in the NSABP B-31 trial (8). In the Cochrane meta-analysis, 135 (2.5%) patients developed CCF on the trastuzumab arms compared to 20 (0.4%) patients amongst control arms (RR: 5.11, 90% CI: 3–8.72, P<0.00001). Meanwhile, LVEF decline occurred in 11.2% of cases vs. 5.6% of controls (RR: 1.83, 90% CI: 1.36–2.47, P=0.0008) (3). Reasons for differing rates of TRC across studies include differences in study design, schedule of LVEF monitoring, partner chemotherapy drugs administered, patient population recruited, and definitions of TRC.

The recently reported individual patient data meta-analysis by de Azambuja and colleagues of the NSABP B-31, NCCTG N9831 and HERA trials provides some more granular information on the timing of TRC and risk factors associated with its occurrence (9). Dr. de Azambuja and colleagues should be congratulated for generating a detailed dataset on TRC from randomized trials using individual patient data, and their meta-analysis provides an up-to-date reference for clinicians and researchers interested in this problem. The meta-analysis included 7,445 patients, with 4,017 patients treated in the trastuzumab arm and 3,439 patients in the control arm. All patients on the NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831 received doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel chemotherapy, whereas on the HERA trial at least an anthracycline ± taxane was administered in the vast majority (94%) of patients. All patients in the meta-analysis who received anthracyclines did so prior to trastuzumab, whereas paclitaxel was given concurrently with trastuzumab in 59.5% and sequentially in the remainder. The meta-analysis would have been strengthened with the inclusion of patients on the BCIRG-006 trial, as it contained a large population of patients who did not receive anthracyclines (6), given the use of anthracyclines in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer remains an ongoing issue of debate (10).

Consistent with the previously reported Cochrane meta-analysis, prevalence of TRC in patients treated with trastuzumab was 11.3%, with the majority of these events being an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic LVEF decline (8.7%) (9). The prevalence of TRC events in the combined control arm was not reported. Rates of symptomatic CCF and cardiac deaths were low with seven deaths in the trastuzumab arm and five in the control arm. Severe CCF (NYHA Grade III–IV) occurred in 2.3% in the trastuzumab arm vs. 0.8% in the control arm. Of interest, only 48/452 patients (10%) who developed TRC had this occur >28 days after the completion of trastuzumab (9). Although there was an excess of 10 years of median follow-up for efficacy outcomes, long-term toxicity outcomes, including trajectory of cardiac recovery, was not able to be reported due to heterogeneous data available on late LVEF monitoring across the studies. In the NSABP B-31 study, 31 patients (4.1%) in trastuzumab group developed CCF, of which only 1/27 who were followed after 6 months after the onset of CCF had persistent symptoms (11).

Several baseline characteristics are known to be associated with increased risk of TRC from the individual trials, and the findings from the recent individual patient data meta-analysis are not surprising. Low baseline LVEF <60%, high BMI (>25), history of hypertension and age (≥60) were associated with increased TRC risk, with the presence of multiple (>2) risk factors doubling the relative risk of TRC (9). It is important to highlight here that the definition of ‘baseline’ LVEF differs across studies, with the HERA study recruiting patients at the end of all (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, and thus only the post-anthracycline LVEF would be available in this cohort as the study baseline. Pre-anthracycline LVEF or true ‘baseline’ LVEF data was available from the NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31 studies, and decreased LVEF post-anthracycline of ≥16% was an exclusion criterion (4). Prospective data from the Cardiotoxicity of Adjuvant Trastuzumab Study (CATS) showed that decline in LVEF from pre- to post-anthracycline were associated with TRC in a multicenter Australian cohort (odds ratio: 7.9, P<0.0001) (12). Clinicians should therefore consider both pre-anthracycline and post-anthracycline LVEF values, together with patients’ comorbidities and age to determine their absolute risk of cardiotoxicity with trastuzumab.

Where multiple risk factors exist, or a history of CCF is present, data from the BCIRG-006 study found that the anthracycline-free regimen of carboplatin, docetaxel and trastuzumab (TCH) for 1 year was associated with a lower risk of asymptomatic LVEF decline (9.4%) and CCF (0.4%) compared to doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel and trastuzumab (18.6% LVEF decline, 2% CCF) (6). An exploratory finding from the meta-analysis is that sequential trastuzumab following paclitaxel chemotherapy was associated with a numerically lower rate of TRC (6.9%) compared to concurrent trastuzumab and paclitaxel chemotherapy (17.7%) (9). The difference was largely due to a higher proportion of patients with asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic LVEF decline (13.8% vs. 5.3%). The reason for this difference may be explained by two factors. Firstly it may be simply an artefact due to study design, given that randomization occurred after AC treatment in the studies of sequential trastuzumab administration, thus patients with AC-related cardiotoxicity would have been excluded, whereas in the studies that randomized prior to AC treatment, patients who developed AC-related cardiotoxicity may have been excluded from trastuzumab, but were still included in the intent-to-treat analyses. Secondly, sequential administration of trastuzumab after taxanes results in a longer delay between anthracycline treatment and initiation of trastuzumab, allowing more time for cardiac recovery. However, given that concurrent trastuzumab was associated with a trend towards better disease-free survival in the N9831 trial compared to sequential treatment (13), it is difficult to make a compelling case to administer trastuzumab sequentially to adjuvant chemotherapy, and TCH should be favored in patients with high risk of TRC.

A limitation when applying the results of the meta-analysis by de Azambuja and colleagues to contemporary clinical practice is only a very small proportion of patients received neoadjuvant treatment, and none received contemporary anti-HER2 therapies such as pertuzumab, T-DM1, and neratinib. Given the benefit of neoadjuvant pertuzumab (14) and adjuvant TDM1 (15), many patients with locally advanced HER2+ breast cancer are now treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. More data is required on cardiotoxicity rates when trastuzumab is used in the neoadjuvant setting. In a meta-analysis of five trials including 515 patients randomized to trastuzumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, pathological complete response rates were increased with the addition of trastuzumab. Cardiotoxicity rates were low in these trials, although all required a baseline LVEF >55% compared to the adjuvant trials which generally allowed patients with baseline LVEF >50% (16). Reassuringly, the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab for the treatment of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer was not associated with higher rates of cardiotoxicity or asymptomatic LVEF decline (17). While TDM1 and neratinib have also not been shown to be associated with high rates of cardiotoxicity to date (18), this is an area requiring further study in the real-world context given the highly selected nature of patients enrolled into clinical trials.

Identification of biomarkers to predict for and allow earlier identification and treatment of TRC remains an area of active interest in the cardio-oncology field. Although elevated serum biomarkers have been associated with anthracycline-related toxicity, the predictive and prognostic benefit of routine troponin T, troponin I and BNP monitoring is controversial (12,19). Given the measurement variability particularly with LVEF monitoring by transthoracic echocardiogram, myocardial deformation imaging using cardiac global longitudinal strain (GLS) is increasingly used in research settings (20). GLS has shown to precede LVEF decline, potentially allowing a window for intervention using pharmacological agents such as beta blockers or ACE-I to prevent further LVEF decline (21). Further studies are warranted to identify whether biomarkers of TRC and pharmacoprotective agents can reduce treatment interruptions for patients on trastuzumab. One example of this is the Strain Surveillance during Chemotherapy for Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes (SUCCOUR) study which is a multicenter randomized study examining whether GLS monitoring of cardiac function compared to traditional LVEF monitoring, coupled with early adoption of pharmacoprotective agents results in improved outcomes for patients on chemotherapy and trastuzumab (22).

In summary, the meta-analysis of NSABP B31, NSABP B-31, NCCTG N9831 and HERA trials confirms in large part what is known about risk factors and the clinical course for TRC, a gratifying result from this study of individual patient data. However, there has yet to be a consensus on the optimal biomarkers to identify TRC early, and whether cardioprotective agents have a role in reducing TRC, given the low rates of symptomatic heart failure and fatal cardiac events from trastuzumab. The arsenal of anti-HER2 drugs being used in the clinic is increasingly complex, and this is coupled by rising medical comorbidities in cancer patients. Therefore, ongoing collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists is required to advance the field both in a clinical and research setting.

Acknowledgments

Funding: None.

Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Translational Cancer Research. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2188). JL received grant funding from Astra Zeneca for unrelated research. SG has received research funding from Eli Lilly and G1 Therapeutics, and has served as an advisor to Eli Lilly and Novartis. JMB has served on Advisory Boards for Roche, Lilly, Novartis and Pfizer with payment to her Institution. Travel funded by Roche.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

References

1. Hudis CA. Trastuzumab--mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med 2007;357:39-51. [Crossref] [PubMed]
2. Mohan N, Shen Y, Endo Y, et al. Trastuzumab, but not pertuzumab, dysregulates HER2 signaling to mediate inhibition of autophagy and increase in reactive oxygen species production in human cardiomyocytes. Mol Cancer Ther 2016;15:1321-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
3. Moja L, Tagliabue L, Balduzzi S, et al. Trastuzumab containing regimens for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;CD006243. [PubMed]
4. Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1673-84. [Crossref] [PubMed]
5. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1659-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
6. Slamon D, Eiermann W, Robert N, et al. Adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1273-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
7. Joensuu H, Bono P, Kataja V, et al. Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide with either docetaxel or vinorelbine, with or without trastuzumab, as adjuvant treatments of breast cancer: final results of the FinHer Trial. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5685-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
8. Romond EH, Jeong JH, Rastogi P, et al. Seven-year follow-up assessment of cardiac function in NSABP B-31, a randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (ACP) with ACP plus trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:3792-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
9. de Azambuja E, Ponde N, Procter M, et al. A pooled analysis of the cardiac events in the trastuzumab adjuvant trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020;179:161-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
10. Caparica R, Bruzzone M, Poggio F, et al. Anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy versus docetaxel and cyclophosphamide in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019;174:27-37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
11. Tan-Chiu E, Yothers G, Romond E, et al. Assessment of cardiac dysfunction in a randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel, with or without trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy in node-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: NSABP B-31. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7811-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
12. Goel S, Liu J, Guo H, et al. Decline in left ventricular ejection fraction following anthracyclines predicts trastuzumab cardiotoxicity. JACC Heart Fail 2019;7:795-804. [Crossref] [PubMed]
13. Perez EA, Suman VJ, Davidson NE, et al. Sequential versus concurrent trastuzumab in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:4491-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
14. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, et al. 5-year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:791-800. [Crossref] [PubMed]
15. von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;380:617-28. [Crossref] [PubMed]
16. Valachis A, Mauri D, Polyzos NP, et al. Trastuzumab combined to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 2011;20:485-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
17. Swain SM, Ewer MS, Cortes J, et al. Cardiac tolerability of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in CLEOPATRA: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. Oncologist 2013;18:257-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
18. Sendur MA, Aksoy S, Altundag K. Cardiotoxicity of novel HER2-targeted therapies. Curr Med Res Opin 2013;29:1015-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
19. Goel S, Beith JM. Troponin I as a predictor for trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity: current data do not provide mechanistic insights or allow for incorporation into clinical practice. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:e175-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
20. Fei HW, Ali MT, Tan TC, et al. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain in HER-2 + breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines and trastuzumab who develop cardiotoxicity is associated with subsequent recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction. Echocardiography 2016;33:519-26. [Crossref] [PubMed]
21. Poterucha JT, Kutty S, Lindquist RK, et al. Changes in left ventricular longitudinal strain with anthracycline chemotherapy in adolescents precede subsequent decreased left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2012;25:733-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
22. Negishi T, Thavendiranathan P, Negishi K, et al. Rationale and design of the strain surveillance of chemotherapy for improving cardiovascular outcomes: the SUCCOUR trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:1098-105. [Crossref] [PubMed]