In 2025, many authors make outstanding contributions to our journal. Their articles published with us have received very well feedback in the field and stimulate a lot of discussions and new insights among the peers.
Hereby, we would like to highlight some of our outstanding authors who have been making immense efforts in their research fields, with a brief interview of their unique perspectives and insightful views as authors.
Outstanding Authors (2025)
Fangdi Sun, Stanford University, USA
Linda Hammerich, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany
Ari Kassardjian, City of Hope National Medical Center, USA
Takafumi Hayashi, Kawasaki Medical School, Japan
Yajnavalka Banerjee, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai
Shirin Davarpanah Jazi, BrainCool AB, Sweden
Outstanding Author
Fangdi Sun
Dr. Fangdi Sun is the Chief Fellow for the Hematology & Medical Oncology fellowship at Stanford University. She received her BS in Bioengineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, followed by her MD from Harvard Medical School. She then completed her Residency and Chief Residency in Internal Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco prior to coming to Stanford. She is establishing an academic career as a clinical investigator in Thoracic / H&N medical oncology. Her research interests include targeted therapies in NSCLC, virus-driven malignancies, and the appropriate use of circulating tumor DNA in the early-stage setting.
TCR: What are the essential elements of a good academic paper?
Dr. Sun: The building blocks of strong academic writing start well before the first word is written. The author needs to understand the landscape of existing knowledge in their field, and how the topic they plan to address, even if highly specific, will fit into and contribute to this body of knowledge. For original research, the data elements, collection methods, and analysis plan should be clearly defined a priori, then followed in a rigorous manner to ensure data quality and minimize bias. For review articles or editorials, the authors should have an idea of who their intended audience is in order to best structure and summarize the topic of interest. Finally, the best academic papers are often ones where the figures (and occasionally the tables) tell most of the story. When it comes down to the actual writing, most of the hard work should already have been done.
TCR: What are the key skill sets of an author?
Dr. Sun: Patience and perseverance are the most important characteristics of an academic author, but also some of the hardest skills to learn. The obvious interpretation is that science is a series of successes and failures, as anyone who has tried to publish a peer-reviewed article knows the experience of having a manuscript rejected by one or many journals. Yet more importantly, being willing to put pen to paper is critical, whether with the first iteration of a study concept or the first draft of a manuscript. Then having the patience to go back and iterate upon this can be even more challenging. The most successful people are willing to go out on a limb in the beginning, not letting perfection be the enemy of good.
TCR: Is there any interesting story during academic writing that you would like to share with us?
Dr. Sun: I am always impressed by patients’ willingness to have their stories told through the lens of an academic case report. While I have often worried that patients will object to having specific details of their individual treatment experience shared publicly, the near-universal answer is one of immediate agreement. Behind this answer is a sense of altruism – a hope that such information will help someone else in their position. When possible, the ability to share the published case report with the patient or family is particularly meaningful. In general, I view this as a reminder that we have a responsibility to share information back to patients, the most important partners in what we do.
(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)
Linda Hammerich
Dr. Linda Hammerich is the head of the Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy Lab at the Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology at Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin (Berlin, Germany). She is an immunologist by training with a strong background in chronic liver diseases and high-throughput single-cell methods. Her scientific interests include developing and improving immunotherapies for gastrointestinal cancers and immune monitoring of cancer patients using full spectrum flow cytometry and mass cytometry. She is also researching and developing refinement measures to improve animal welfare in preclinical studies.
Dr. Hammerich believes that academic writing is an essential tool for sharing knowledge, communicating ideas with peers, and developing critical thinking skills. It helps to express complex ideas in a clear and precise manner and allows researchers to document research findings and developments over time. Sharing ideas, theories, and results (even negative ones) builds and advances the knowledge base within a particular field and drives the development of new ideas and concepts. Academic writing also encourages critical thinking, engaging with the work of others, and challenging one’s own thoughts, which is crucial for personal growth as a researcher.
In Hammerich’s view, critical writing involves questioning and analyzing ideas or concepts carefully to draw well-informed conclusions. It is crucial to consider multiple perspectives, including but not limited to one’s own, and to consider the context in which information or evidence is presented. She adds, “Be not just descriptive, but examine ideas or assumptions, question them, and point out strengths and weaknesses. Critical writing often suggests alternative solutions rather than merely highlighting flaws. It also requires self-awareness to recognize personal biases and their potential influence on your writing. Finally, be as clear and precise as possible and present a logical and focused analysis of the data.”
(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)
Ari A. Kassardjian
Ari Kassardjian is a 4th year radiation oncology resident at City of Hope National Medical Center. He received a Bachelor of Science from Georgetown University in Washington, DC, followed by his MD from Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California. His research interests include CT- and MR-based online adaptive radiotherapy, expanding indications of radiation for cutaneous malignancies, and long-term patient reported outcomes in head and neck cancer. His recent research includes a prospective analysis of patient perceptions and expectations of radiation therapy before and after consultation. Additionally, he is working on a project evaluating patterns of breast cancer recurrence following neoadjuvant systemic therapy to assess whether a subset with low-risk residual disease may benefit from partial breast irradiation. His other research interests include changes in patient characteristics and demographics over time, expanding healthcare delivery and access to medically underserved communities, and patient education. Connect with Dr. Kassardjian on X.
In Dr. Kassardjian’s opinion, having a clearly defined research question and easily interpretable figures, both supported by robust data, represent the most important aspects of writing an academic paper. In addition, a strong paper should be written in a way that is accessible to a broad audience, including those not directly involved in the field. Double- and triple-checking one’s work for clarity, grammar, and syntax can help ensure other key components, such as a comprehensive literature review, structured methodology, and a discussion highlighting the significance and implication of one’s findings, shine through effectively.
On the other hand, Dr. Kassardjian highlights the importance of following reporting guidelines when writing a manuscript. Guidelines, such as SROBE and PRISMA, standardize the data reporting process, and ensure thoroughness, clarity, and transparency. Although research projects can generate interesting results, those results should be reproducible, and reporting guidelines are an important avenue for collaboration with researchers from other institutions or countries.
“The most important piece of advice I want to give to others engaging in scientific research is to always remain open-minded and curious. No matter what stage of education, training, or research that I am in, there is always something new to learn, and I never assume that I know everything. Always be open, humble, and receptive to help and advise. Establish mentors and ask for feedback early. Collaboration is key; engage with your peers, share your findings, and be willing to learn from others. Finally, remember that setbacks are part of the journey, but they often lead to the most significant breakthroughs!” says Dr. Kassardjian.
(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)
Takafumi Hayashi
Takafumi Hayashi, MD, PhD, is the Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology at Kawasaki Medical School, and Director at the Center for Radiation Therapy, Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center. His research area covers Thoracic Radiation Oncology. Recently, his research focuses on metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastasis. This new approach involves targeting specific metastatic tumors with precision therapies to control cancer spread and improve patient outcomes. Dr. Hayashi received his Ph.D. from the Faculty of Medicine at Shimane University and has over 10 years of experience as a certified diagnostic imaging specialist. He was later qualified as a radiation oncologist. In his clinical practice, he prioritizes building trusting relationships with his patients and providing personalized treatment plans that make full use of the latest technology. Since 2016, he has been focusing on comprehensive and precise radiation therapy at Kawasaki Medical School. In addition to clinical practice and research, he also finds joy in teaching students.
In Dr. Hayashi’s opinion, effective medical writing requires several key skills. First, strong communication skills are essential. Clearly and systematically expressing complex medical ideas requires concise and well-organized writing. This ensures that research findings are presented in a way that is easy for readers to understand. Second, analytical skills play a vital role. A deep understanding of research methods and basic statistical principles, along with the ability to think critically and interpret data accurately, is crucial. These skills enable authors to thoroughly analyze their data and draw reliable, evidence-based conclusions. Finally, he believes that patience, paired with a desire to continuously learn, is equally important. Writing a quality paper often involves multiple rounds of revisions, which demand persistence. Additionally, staying up to date with the latest advancements and technologies in the medical field ensures that the research remains practical, valuable, and aligned with current needs and challenges.
Bias in medical publications can distort the interpretation of research, so it is crucial, according to Dr. Hayashi, to approach writing with a commitment to objectivity and clarity. To achieve this, he believes it is essential to rigorously gather and verify information using reliable sources, and then present findings in careful, neutral language—avoiding overly emotional phrases or stereotypes. Additionally, welcoming feedback from a wide range of colleagues not only enriches the perspective of the work but also helps ensure that the final publication maintains a high standard of credibility. By incorporating these practices into the writing process, researchers can produce medical literature that is both trustworthy and effective.
“Academic writing, while requiring considerable time and effort, is a deeply fulfilling endeavor. Driven by a deep curiosity, I am motivated to share knowledge that will enhance medical care and positively impact health outcomes. Moreover, the process of writing fosters the exchange of ideas and the development of critical thinking skills, both of which I find intrinsically rewarding. These elements collectively support my motivation to pursue academic scholarship,” says Dr. Hayashi.
(by Brad Li, Masaki Lo)
Dr. Yajnavalka Banerjee is an Associate Professor of Biochemistry at Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai, UAE. With a PhD from the National University of Singapore and postdoctoral fellowships at The Scripps Research Institute and Max Planck Institute, he holds distinguished recognitions, including the NIH and Alexander von Humboldt Fellowships. His research spans venom-derived therapeutics, cardiovascular disease, and colorectal cancer, with a recent focus on protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) signaling, statin repurposing, and nutraceuticals in inflammation. He is the principal investigator of several funded studies, including those by Pfizer and Amgen, and is actively exploring AI-integrated pharmacogenomics. A prolific author with over 90 peer-reviewed publications and multiple patents, he also plays a pivotal role in medical education innovation, curriculum design, and student mentorship. He serves on the editorial boards of several high-impact journals and is committed to translating basic science into therapeutic strategies that address regional and global health priorities.
Dr. Banerjee believes a good academic paper presents a clearly defined research question, supported by rigorous methodology, robust data, and critical analysis. It must demonstrate originality, relevance to the field, and contextual depth by engaging with current literature. In translational cancer research, a strong paper bridges basic science and clinical application, offering insights with potential therapeutic impact. Clarity of presentation, reproducibility of results, and a coherent narrative from hypothesis to conclusion are essential. Finally, the study should acknowledge limitations and propose future directions that align with advancing patient care or mechanistic understanding.
From Dr. Banerjee’s perspective, authors must ensure clarity, accuracy, and scientific rigor throughout the manuscript. In translational cancer research, aligning the study with clinical relevance is key. A well-structured paper should include a compelling rationale, detailed methodology, and statistically sound results. Authors must use appropriate controls, justify experimental models, and interpret findings within the broader scientific context. Ethical compliance, transparency in data reporting, and proper referencing are critical. Attention to journal-specific guidelines, figure quality, and language precision enhances readability and impact. Lastly, authors should clearly articulate how their findings advance translational insight or therapeutic innovation in cancer research.
“The pursuit of discovery and the potential to contribute meaningfully to patient outcomes drive my academic writing. In translational cancer research, the opportunity to bridge laboratory findings with clinical relevance is deeply fulfilling. Writing allows me to distill complex data into insights that can inform therapy, guide future research, and inspire collaboration. The process, though demanding, sharpens critical thinking and fosters intellectual growth. Ultimately, the motivation lies in knowing that each well-crafted paper is a step toward innovation, impact, and advancing science in service of humanity,” says Dr. Banerjee.
(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)
Shirin Davarpanah Jazi
Dr. Shirin Davarpanah Jazi completed her PhD in Human Motor Control at Western University, Canada, in 2016, followed by a one-year postdoctoral fellowship at the same institution. Afterward, she pursued a degree in Physiotherapy at McMaster University, Canada. Due to family reasons, she relocated to Sweden, where she began working as a Clinical Support Manager at BrainCool AB, focusing on projects related to concussion and oncology. Her current focus is on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and oral mucositis. She collaborates closely with research teams in Basel, Switzerland, and Umeå, Sweden, to advance her work in these areas. Connect with her on LinkedIn.
Dr. Jazi believes academic writing is one of the most important ways to deepen researchers’ understanding of the world around them and a powerful means for scientists to share their voices globally. She sees it as the official language of science. To her, academic writing is crucial for both explaining a subject and analyzing its significance. A critical approach in writing entails analyzing the topic from various perspectives, considering both positive and negative aspects, while steering clear of bias, subjectivity, and unsupported personal opinions.
(by Sasa Zhu, Brad Li)